"Where Sweatshops are a Dream"
is an article written by Nicholas D. Kristof, published in the New York Times
on January 15, 2009. He argues that sweatshops are not the cause of poverty it
is only a symptom. In other words, there are more severe issues involving
poverty in these poor countries such as Africa and China. He begins his article
by inviting our former president Barack Obama to a tour of the garbage dump in
Phnom Penh. Although, Obama probably isn't going to respond to his message, he
made a great point. The government loves to talk about "labor
standards" but does not take initiative to actually make a change. He
refutes his argument by stating," Mr. Obama and the democrats who favor
labor standards in trade agreements mean well for they intend to fight back
oppressive sweatshops abroad". But little do they know, sweatshops aren’t
the worst focal point in the poorest countries, the garbage dump is!
Nicholas
uses awesome figurative language such as metaphors, imagery, similes, and
allusion to describe the dirty dumps in Phnom Penh. For example, he says “this
is a Dante-like vision of hell (simile & allusion). It’s a mountain of
festering refuse, a half-hour hike across, emitting clouds of clouds of smoke
from subterranean." for those who don't know, "Dante's Inferno"
is not only an epic poem but also a game about the journeys Dante took through
the stages of hell and Nicholas was comparing the dumps to hell. He then goes
into further details using imagery by stating," The miasma of toxic stink
leaves you gasping, breezes batter you with filth, and even the rats look
forlorn". Not only does this make me want to throw up, but i feel bad for
the civilians who slave every day in these dumps collecting recycle for only
one cent per pound.
Nicholas
is credible due to the fact that he personally experienced the living standards
in East Asia as well as his wife who lived in a village in Southern China. He
states that "in the hierarchy of jobs in poor countries, sweltering at a
sewing machine isn't the bottom". He also talks to victims of the garbage
dumps who claim that they rather be working in the factory. Pim Srey Rath, a 19-year-old
woman, states that "at least that work has shade, here is where its
hot". Not only is working outside in the heat stressful, but it’s also
extremely dangerous. Nicholas seeks further information by talking to Vath Sam
Oeun who hopes that her 10-year-old son grows up to work in a factory due to
her encounters of seeing other children getting ran over by dumpster trucks or
loosing limbs. By the use of pathos, Nicholas appeals to his audience
profoundly creating a disturbing image in the minds of others.
Many
Americans go against sweatshops because we live in a society that has more
appropriate working and living environments compared to other poor countries
but to them a sweatshop is high class. overall, Nicholas does a magnificent job
portraying his message and defending his argument. he uses a great amount of
figurative language, the rhetorical triangle and evidence to help support his
argument. His purpose is to bring to light a situation that many
misinterpret. As a former civilian living in the poorest country, Nicholas
knows the sorrows faced by many in his country and he simply wants Americans to
be informed. Instead of protesting against sweatshops, Americans should help
promote manufacturing.
Overall you accomplished all of the requirements for a decent rhetorical analysis, for example: the introduction was very ground-breaking, stating that the "issues" that Americans face are not so heavy when compared to sweatshops in third world countries. In addition, I love the way that you included the strong allusion to dante's infereno. Great Job! 4/4
ReplyDelete